Search found 334 matches

by Sundex
24 Aug 2019 23:03
Forum: theories
Topic: Sundex's Theories
Replies: 99
Views: 117911

Subverse and its Application

BIG 100!!! I really need some feedback on this one. We have 10 Sub "Main Series" games, 3 "Side games", and a "SNEEMSPO". As of 2014, Mateusz made HD versions for every game. There were changes made to some games that made them all canon… Notice how I said that every ga...
by Sundex
14 Jul 2019 15:57
Forum: general discussion
Topic: M-A-T v2.0: General Mat Activity Thread
Replies: 191
Views: 194776

Re: M-A-T v2.0: General Mat Activity Thread

@ko9 I am still thinking... How is heritage relevant in this case?
by Sundex
11 Jun 2019 03:29
Forum: theories
Topic: Sundex's Theories
Replies: 99
Views: 117911

SOLVED!!!

YES, I AM POSTING AGAIN INSTEAD OF TAKING A DAY TO LET THE INFORMATION SINK IN, BUT THIS IS EXCITING NEWS!!! I was talking to a friend on Discord (Argonbolt) who had been theorizing for a while (he has a location in Subverse). I told him about the main claim and the side claim that I had been trying...
by Sundex
11 Jun 2019 02:13
Forum: theories
Topic: Sundex's Theories
Replies: 99
Views: 117911

More Lab Portal Stuff Yay

Were you trying to go for something that shows "both maps appear to be part of the same layer --> the portal hasn't changed layers --> the portal doesn't change layers during transport"? Because that in itself has a whole lot wrong with it. I am now in full agreement with this statement. ...
by Sundex
08 Jun 2019 02:16
Forum: general discussion
Topic: M-A-T v2.0: General Mat Activity Thread
Replies: 191
Views: 194776

Re: M-A-T v2.0: General Mat Activity Thread

To be honest - I'm not sure. But I know both these are wrong. Those locations are not arrange by their layer number. They're arranged by previous games they respond to. Layering would be bit more chaotic. like, 4, 1, 7, 3.... etc etc. Can we all agree that every Sub 10 locations does not have to be...
by Sundex
08 Jun 2019 01:24
Forum: theories
Topic: Sundex's Theories
Replies: 99
Views: 117911

The 3rd Layer (cont.)

For us to be able to discern that a lab portal does not transport players through layers, we need two views of the same location. In this case, we need to analyze two of each of the following locations (as they are the most relevant in supporting the claim): 1. 747 2. 552 Let's start with 747. For r...
by Sundex
07 Jun 2019 23:35
Forum: theories
Topic: Sundex's Theories
Replies: 99
Views: 117911

The 3rd Layer

I will get straight to the point here: The player traverses in the third layer for at least Submachine 2 through up to and (maybe) including Submachine 7. The initial proof can be found in Submachine 9. Near the end of the game, the player has to go into layer 3 to revisit the mover used previously ...
by Sundex
10 Jan 2019 19:51
Forum: theories and suggestions
Topic: VOIDSCAN
Replies: 269
Views: 242422

Re: VOIDSCAN

A friend sent me these
by Sundex
17 Aug 2018 03:26
Forum: theories
Topic: Collaborative Theories
Replies: 2
Views: 3744

Collaborative Theories

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tpx ... sp=sharing

Contibuting Collaborators: Chryoyo, Sundex, PiedPiper2020, & Seizurecube! Feel free to question the madness that is this document. We will answer as many rational questions as possible!
by Sundex
20 Jul 2018 13:39
Forum: the Submachines
Topic: Submachine 10: the Exit
Replies: 745
Views: 292551

Re: Submachine 10: the Exit

If by fluid you mean with less run-ending glitches, then yes.