Pastelland Forum

I mean the cart could have been on a scheduled movement when the portal was created. It could have been transferring something between locations in the Void when the creation happened. Since karma portal creation destroys matter but keeps surrounding chunks in place, maybe the cart stopped.

This also disproves the idea that green karma portals are multi-layer. The green karma portal in the temple that leads to the mover disappears when not in layer 3, so it can't be multi-layer.

Plus, the mover still had the wisdom gems in it. Even with it being damaged, the damage is nowhere near the power source. It could have kept moving.

It doesn't disprove the multiple layers theory because every other green karma portal in the game spans all 7 layers at least. (Probably 8th too but I haven't checked).

If anything, it adds to the theory that green karma portals have both the capacity to exist in multiple layers as well as just one.

As far as being able to still move, nobody is going to be able to prove that the mover can still operate and move with that much damage.

I have more evidence. If you look closely at the switches, you can see that the door is open in the mover in Submachine 9. Now, why would the door be open? When we went from the grey mover to the blue one in Submachine 6, we opened the door, but never closed it. The only door that closed was the one to the blue mover.

It's possible the mover door closed after the blue cube door. Notice how quickly the blue door closed. I'm assuming that's to quickly contain any perceived threat that decided to move to the blue cube. It's possible that door closed quickly, and then the mover door closed afterward.

Like before, nobody can prove that's what did or didn't happen, and in that case it shouldn't be used as evidence to support anything.

Then why is the Submachine 9 mover door open?

I don't know.

I think the only way it could have opened is if someone opened it. And as far as we know, we are the only one after the Jumper to open it.

Right, and if that is the case that makes perfect sense. But we can't prove with 100%certainty that's the case.