Pastelland Forum

Yeah, plus it isn't even listed as a main game (as it doesn't have an actual connection to the storyline).

yeah, spinoffs aren't connected to the main line storyline. though in the submachine main page 0, F, 32 (and likely ∞ in the future) are connected, i wonder what does that mean.

I just imagine them to be connected as spinnoff games, simply

it's possible, i guess. the lines could join the games in categories, it would make sense for Subverse to be apart of everything.

Not in my opion.
My Black Dossier hinges on the idea that each of the spin off characters are one of the Murtuaghs in their own layer.

I wonder will we ever be given the explanation what the hell happened in those spin-offs (who's player, why we were there, etc)

If I'm not mistaken, it was said the series will end like Lost, leaving some questions to the interpretation of the public.

gil2455526 wrote:If I'm not mistaken, it was said the series will end like Lost, leaving some questions to the interpretation of the public.

NO!
Come on!

That'd be a dick move on Mateusz's part. At least the plot of Lost was explained afterward!
Who knows if he'll ever explain Submachine's plot in its entirety to us!

NO
WAY

We claim our deserved answers!!!

Or perhaps - don't explain everything just yet.

Reveal what must be revealed in Sub10, finish the main story, and only some time afterwards, launch one final game that wraps and reveals the whole Submachine story as a closing to the current plotline, so that the fans, who have waited for so long, may have their dear answers WHILE having lots of time to interpretate the universe even after the "last game" is launched.

Thoughts?

(And BTW, I'm all in for a Kent Waterfalls spin-off. Would be interesting.)