Submachine Wiki
Re: Submachine Wiki
It's still manageable. We can protect the most important pages if the spam grows, but I think it hasn't been important so far.
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16589
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: Submachine Wiki
OK, 200 PEOPLE voted.
Maybe someone will change poll?
Maybe someone will change poll?
Re: Submachine Wiki
-When do you think the next Submachine will come out?
-What kind of personality does Mur have?
Just some ideas.
-What kind of personality does Mur have?
Just some ideas.
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16589
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: Submachine Wiki
Sublevel wants to change the poll! let's cheer him! 

- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16589
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: Submachine Wiki
Vortex the Administrator! Do your duty!
Re: Submachine Wiki
But... the point of the wiki is that everyone edits...
oh, okay...
oh, okay...
- ENIHCAMBUS
- karma portal traveller
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: 04 Feb 2013 22:17
- Location: Pastel Lands.
Re: Submachine Wiki
I just did what nobody did. Add the last forum posts to the forum post page. 

ENIHCAMBUS: State of the Art Scanning!

Re: Submachine Wiki
thanks man!
- Sublevel 114
- layer restorer
- Posts: 16589
- Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23
Re: Submachine Wiki
Please, help me.
I am translating Forum posts and I has some problems with translation.
1)
And what does mean 'Builders point of view'?
2)
I am translating Forum posts and I has some problems with translation.
1)
I don't understand this:Lemartes wrote:
As for Sub 0 (Ancient Sub) Who is to say this was not the 1st Submachine built. After all even if time travel was involved according to anyone other than the builders it would have been the 1st. Its construction predates the the rest so far as we know on a liner time line. Wouldn't
that make it the 1st one build by a historical point of view
I am to say this. ;). it was made long after the first submachine. From the builders point of view, naturally, what other point of view can w take?...
historical? with the time machine a 'historical' point of view doesnt exist anymore.... Besides, they're ancient RUINS. we've got ruins up to date, so who tossed the idea that ancient location was built in BC? they could've built it in 1932 using some old ruins, as I see it. I'm not saying that they did, but there is a possibility...
sentence.After all even if time travel was involved according to anyone other than the builders it would have been the 1st.
And what does mean 'Builders point of view'?
2)
What does this sentence mean?Lemartes wrote:
I think the reason you see no people is cause your the straggler in this game you have been left behind to catch up with everyone else.
Last edited by Sublevel 114 on 15 Aug 2013 14:40, edited 1 time in total.