Page 2 of 9

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 00:12
by Vortex
The Abacus wrote:Is there a not for now option for voting?
It's not for now, but for future batches, as I understood it.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 00:16
by Rooster5man
I really appreciate you guys (i.e. Vortex and Ant) nominating myself and RedAfro (if anyone deserves their Theory in SNEE, it's him.) I feel though that, so far, my Theories might not exactly fit in SNEE.

Don't get me wrong, it'd be absolutely amazing to get a Theory of mine in SNEE, and I do feel somewhat proud of my Corpses-Portal Theory (as long as it's not "Corpses in the Core," which is already Debunked, but then again, so is Vortex's "Einstein the Cat" Theory :P.) However, I feel if it's not really going to add anything to the storyline, as Robobrain's, DR's, Ant's, etc., have, then there's no use for them in SNEE.

But I'll gladly second the nomination for RedAfro, I really like his Theories, especially the one Ant brought up.

For right now, I don't believe you (Mateusz) need to add any Theories in SNEE unless needed, but, except for RedAfro's, nothing really stands out as "interesting" (no offense to anyone - After all, there haven't been that many Theory Creators recently anyway) enough to put into SNEE and possibly base a room after said Theory.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 00:39
by Vortex
Rooster5man wrote:I really appreciate you guys (i.e. Vortex and Ant) nominating myself and RedAfro (if anyone deserves their Theory in SNEE, it's him.) I feel though that, so far, my Theories might not exactly fit in SNEE.

Don't get me wrong, it'd be absolutely amazing to get a Theory of mine in SNEE, and I do feel somewhat proud of my Corpses-Portal Theory (as long as it's not "Corpses in the Core," which is already Debunked, but then again, so is Vortex's "Einstein the Cat" Theory :P.) However, I feel if it's not really going to add anything to the storyline, as Robobrain's, DR's, Ant's, etc., have, then there's no use for them in SNEE.
Aww, well, if that's what you decided, it's okay :)
and yeah, my theory is debunked, but I think it wasn't at the time I made it XP
Rooster5man wrote:But I'll gladly second the nomination for RedAfro, I really like his Theories, especially the one Ant brought up.

For right now, I don't believe you (Mateusz) need to add any Theories in SNEE unless needed, but, except for RedAfro's, nothing really stands out as "interesting" (no offense to anyone - After all, there haven't been that many Theory Creators recently anyway) enough to put into SNEE and possibly base a room after said Theory.
Yeah, if I were to pick one theory, it would be Redafro's.
And it's true that there aren't many theory creators, in a way it's logical because the end of the main storyline is nearing and there's not that much freedom to make theories, now that we're learning more facts. So Mateusz won't have to worry about making space for many new theories because there will be few left to do.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 00:50
by Rooster5man
and yeah, my theory is debunked, but I think it wasn't at the time I made it XP
That was sort of my point :P If "Corpses Stored in the Core" was put in SNEE without a consensus by the community that it was Debunked, then it would fall in the category along with your Einstein theory :P However, knowing it's Debunked, it doesn't really fit in SNEE, does it? People would be asking themselves "Why was this just put in SNEE when we already know it's Debunked?"

And I don't want to jinx it, but there's only 3 "No's" in the voting anyway, so it's not that big of a deal :P
And it's true that there aren't many theory creators, in a way it's logical because the end of the main storyline is nearing and there's not that much freedom to make theories, now that we're learning more facts. So Mateusz won't have to worry about making space for many new theories because there will be few left to do.
Yeah - This far along in the Series, with only 2 main storyline games to go, that's really another factor to not put in any Theories, other than people running out of ideas :P

Unless Mateusz wanted SNEE to become mostly Canon anyway (which it might end up being), then there's really no use for new Theories to be added.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 01:03
by Redafro
Wow, thanks guys. :)

I find myself simply wanting to include at least one decent theory from anyone who has been an actively theorizing forum member for a while who hasn't already had a theory up. I can't think of any specific theories, but I like Vortex's suggestions.

Edit: actually, now that I think of it, there was some good layer theories that came out a few months ago that would be good.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 01:09
by Rooster5man
You're welcome!

Something like TheVoid's Layer/Tree Theory? I actually didn't remember that till just now.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 01:18
by Redafro
Could be! :oops: I don't remember who's theory it was, and I basically just gave it a cursury glance and thought "yep, that's pretty much what I think is going on with the layers." XD

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 05:22
by WorldisQuiet5256
EDIT: there are a few nice theories in the wiki, but the owners are missing in the forum. For those whose owners are still here, Cone's Karma Ocean theory is good, and Azareus' theory is too. Also there are WorldisQuiet's theories, but after the incident in the subnet thread I dunno if he'll want, so I'll leave it there
Oh no, I'm Gamed.

Awaiting further instructions.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 11:07
by Sublevel 114
In summary, possible theory owners I "nominate":

-Redafro
-Roosterman
-RuloCore
-Sublevel (fanfic)
-Cone
-Azareus
Image

If Mateusz adds my fanfic, then he should add AK's Alek adventure to SNEE. XD]
BTW, I have theories.

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Posted: 27 Jan 2013 11:47
by Vortex
I find myself simply wanting to include at least one decent theory from anyone who has been an actively theorizing forum member for a while who hasn't already had a theory up. I can't think of any specific theories, but I like Vortex's suggestions.
Yeah, that's my feeling too. Since they have worried about theorizing and discussing about Submachine, even now that it's hard to follow the current discussion and theories, I think having the chance to place their result in SNEE is one of the best gifts they could get. Also those theories would show the late-games perspective of the plot we have now, helping to balance the already-debunked theories made in earlier times, it would be like a sign of "evolution" in the project.

Anyhow, this is probably the last "theory request", for the reasons I and Rooster mentioned, so Mateusz can finally rest knowing that after this he won't get more huge to-do lists in his hard drive :P
Oh no, I'm Gamed.

Awaiting further instructions.
But would you like your theories to be in SNEE? I read some of them and they're good, but I haven't "nominated" you because I'm not sure you'll want to, after the discussion you had with Mateusz.
If Mateusz adds my fanfic, then he should add AK's Alek adventure to SNEE. XD]
BTW, I have theories.
Really? Where? I can't find them in the old forum... or are they in this forum?