Page 116 of 292
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 11:43
by Jatsko
*explodes*
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 15:59
by WorldisQuiet5256
Okay, none of you remember Matesuz Saying "There is no 8th Layer", but I found someone else who stated it for him.
I said:
WiQ Date of Post: Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:41 wrote:But there is an Eight Layer, it just that the Seventh Layer has not reach its date that its Reality would change. Thus the Eight button can't exist yet.
Okay, now Rooster said:
Rooster5man Date of post: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:22 wrote:1) Even though you don't believe Mateusz, there are only seven Layers. 3) Back to point 1, it's interesting how you don't believe Mateusz's hints, but you based your Theory around this post: Date of post: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:22
Believe me now?
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 17:00
by ENIHCAMBUS
Rooster5man wrote:Mateusz's hints
Tough I must say that Mateusz hints are made to fool us, they actualy show the truth, but in a way that most people will get an erroneous idea and handle it.
A good example of this is this:
Mateusz Skutnik wrote:1. time period could be different in different dimensions;
2.time could run differently in different dimensions (like in Inception);
3. he also could have been transported in time (remember ending of sub2? it says: did I travel too far, or too early). too early could mean that the lighthouse teleports not only to the outer rim but also 32 years into the past. After 32 years of searching murtaugh is finally ready to return to the core. And in the core it's one day before einstein disappears.
there are 3 explanations for you. no need to panic.
question is: did WE also travel 32 years back to the past when we entered the lighthouse portal?...
These were 3 options, and obviosly people taken the most complex one thinking the most complex one is true. But of course, we saw Sub9 intro then and we got fooled again:
Sub9 wrote:So, did You travel too far, or too early?...
What if I told you - neither?
So option 3, the one that most people choosen because its complexity, was debunked.
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 17:24
by Jatsko
Is there a way we could postpone this argument at least until Sub10 comes out?
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 18:20
by WorldisQuiet5256
I will make one last post in my argument.
ENIHCAMBUS, can you send me a link to where all those quotes are located in the Pastel Forum?
I need them as evident s to make my final argument, and I need the original post locations.
Then, I stop on the wiki.
And Error, I understand how you feel.
Just Like Cat from Daymare Cat said in her song Better:
Better wrote:It ain't worth nothing, if it ain't worth fighting for.
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 18:29
by Jatsko
Well, you don't have to stop editing on the Wiki
entirely of course..
Let's just wait for a while before we make any big arguments about Layers or Theories or things like that. Maybe someday, but not now.
Keeping the Pastel Forum happy
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 19:41
by ENIHCAMBUS
WorldisQuiet5256 wrote:ENIHCAMBUS, can you send me a link to where all those quotes are located in the Pastel Forum?
Look for the "Forum Posts" page on the Wiki.
Re: rant board
Posted: 03 Oct 2014 19:43
by Jatsko
New Rant:
Cannot access Submachine Wiki while I'm at school
Re: rant board
Posted: 04 Oct 2014 08:09
by The Kakama
At least you could bring your phone there, my principal doesn't even allow highlighters. X(
But still. :/
Re: rant board
Posted: 04 Oct 2014 21:36
by Jatsko
Well it helps that we have a cart of Chromebooks in one of our science rooms that I "Borrow" every once in a while
