Pastelland Forum

Also, what you think about finally turning on Message Wall in WikiFeatures instead old school user_talk page? It's very useful and good at notifying you when someone answer you, it's way better option to talk to each other in my opinion.

I don't know, for my part it's ok. Do the old messages get saved?

Vortex wrote:I don't know, for my part it's ok. Do the old messages get saved?

They go to Message_Wall:User/Archived_discussion or something like that.

And the whole system is way better, if i remember correctly right now you get notified only if somebody edit your page, with message wall if you write somebody and he answers you, you also get notified, and e.t.c.

Perfect then. Let's wait for Jatsko to give his agreement, and we'll make the change right away

By the way, am I allowed to put my new theory in the voting page like Anonymous? or it's too late for this voting session?

Vortex wrote:Perfect then. Let's wait for Jatsko to give his agreement, and we'll make the change right away

Whatever works! I don't know too much about it, so have at it

Vortex wrote:By the way, am I allowed to put my new theory in the voting page like Anonymous? or it's too late for this voting session?

I don't know the rules for late theories. At one point I added in the Theory page "If you make a theory while a voting session is active, your new theory will not be included in that voting session." But that was a defense just in case we got a wave of people clamoring to have their theory in the Subnet (I don't know if that misunderstanding has completely left the fanbase).

So I don't want to make the decision. I would rather you guys use your judgment based on what was allowed in past voting sessions, which I wasn't around for. (And if it was allowed, then you'll be sure I'll vote on them!)

Also: WIQ, since you're not allowed to vote on your own theory, I bumped its count back down to 2. For the time being, this is actually good for you, because this puts your theory under the minimum number of votes needed to change status. (Which means, provided no one else votes on it, it will stay as "Unvoted")

Jatsko wrote:So I don't want to make the decision. I would rather you guys use your judgment based on what was allowed in past voting sessions, which I wasn't around for.

I checked the rules of past sessions and I didn't find anything about it, perhaps because it wasn't very common. so I don't know.

Jatsko wrote:under the minimum number of votes needed to change status. (Which means, provided no one else votes on it, it will stay as "Unvoted")

About that, I saw that only three of all likely theories are going to make it past the voting session that ends tomorrow. It makes me a little uncomfortable, though I understand that the rule is there for a good thing.

Should I change it?

I don't know. You can put it at two votes, and I'll change my vote if necessary. Or we can extend the period a little to see if someone else comes in.

I think squeezing in a few theories during a voting session is fine, but there should be a deadline. Like if the voting session starts on January 1st and ends on January 14th, new theories are accepted until January 7th. Any theories added after the 7th would be removed and added in the next session whenever that is.