Page 4 of 200

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 15 Dec 2012 04:55
by Rooster5man
You can post it on the Wiki on your page with your other Theories (unless you need to make a Theory page...) Regardless, you have until after Sub9 to post it since we went past "G" in the sessions already.

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 15 Dec 2012 17:45
by Redafro
Fudge... i find myself voting still-alive most of the time because something is neither confirmed or debunked. Remind me what you guys are using as bases for likely or doubtful? If there is evidence to support the theory, it seems it would be confirmed, and evidence against it would be debunked. So... are we just basing likely and doubtful on our own bias as to what is going on, our on intuition?

Edit: I know, I'm the guy who made a thread on this topic in the old forums. :oops: I know I've used likely or doubtful to describe theories that are only partially debunked/confirmed as well...

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 15 Dec 2012 20:50
by Rooster5man
Remind me what you guys are using as bases for likely or doubtful? If there is evidence to support the theory, it seems it would be confirmed, and evidence against it would be debunked. So... are we just basing likely and doubtful on our own bias as to what is going on, our on intuition?

Edit: I know, I'm the guy who made a thread on this topic in the old forums. I know I've used likely or doubtful to describe theories that are only partially debunked/confirmed as well...
Haha, don't sweat it.

Maybe we are going on our own bias sometimes, but it's mostly confirming facts from Mateusz and the Series and applying them to the Theory, pointing us in which direction to go - Obviously, if there are facts that don't seem likely based on what we know makes the Theory Doubtful. If there's a "metaphysical Theory" (as you said, Theories that describe the SubNet in parts we haven't heard from), I call it Still Alive because we have no word from Mateusz whether or not it's really Debunked.

It's all fact-checking.

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 16 Dec 2012 14:25
by Redafro
Alright... always good to have a refresher. I think that is what I'm doing... XP

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 17:28
by Rooster5man
Good :P

Why isn't anyone voting....?

@Vortex: Why *did* you make all those duplicates by the way? Not to scold you, just asking :P

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 18:35
by gil2455526
Rooster5man wrote:You can post it on the Wiki on your page with your other Theories (unless you need to make a Theory page...) Regardless, you have until after Sub9 to post it since we went past "G" in the sessions already.
Funny thing is, when Sub 9 comes, it will either confirm or bust my theory.

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 18:59
by Vortex
Rooster5man wrote:Good :P

Why isn't anyone voting....?

@Vortex: Why *did* you make all those duplicates by the way? Not to scold you, just asking :P
Well, to add theories faster I copypasted many times a single theory and changed name & author, and it seems I made too many copies and forgot to remove the remaining ones :oops:

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 19:14
by Rooster5man
Funny thing is, when Sub 9 comes, it will either confirm or bust my theory.
Hah, you may have a point...
Well, to add theories faster I copypasted many times a single theory and changed name & author, and it seems I made too many copies and forgot to remove the remaining ones
Oh! I figured that was the case, don't be embarassed, it's a big job to do all that :D

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 18 Dec 2012 17:07
by Sublevel 113
Why noone edits Sub7 article about HD version?And will we create different article about HD versions?

Re: Submachine Wiki

Posted: 18 Dec 2012 17:37
by Rooster5man
Why? We can just add to the original pages in a different section of the page - There are only minor edits in the HD Versions, aren't there? I don't believe it's necessary to clutter up the Wiki(s) with excessive pages dedicated to the HD Versions.