How do you personally distinguish a bias from "facts themselves?" How do you confirm them?
I would argue that the vision we can all share to some degree is rationality inspired by observations and corroboration. The main "code" of that is clear statements and the avoiding of fallacious arguments. That is how we expand and join our vision onto the broad canon of truth.
Your article is interesting, but unclear. Are you saying something like "I know we come from a violent nature, but I hold that together with our modern morality?" That is good, but you make it sound like some epic feet, which that is not necessarily.
I agree it is good to not have boarders to block your vision when investigating beliefs and imaging new possibilities, and if your "floor" is that which has been confirmed by reason, observation, and corroboration, that is a good floor. The thing is, again, this is no different then what most of us believe in. So why do you act as if it is so mystical and epic, as if you alone among humanity has this vision? That seems a very arrogant position to take and very loaded with the bias that you alone have this vision.
Edit:
I will tell you when you learn the Truth base on your post, that the only thing I got to work with.
Again, this has the appearance of sheer arrogance. Your not answering his question, your just saying something like "when you understand, I'll explain it." WTF??? I'm sorry, but you've got to stop that mystical stuff and try a little harder. If you truly do have nothing else "to work with," I question your whole system. Rooster, it seems to me, went straight to the point, even as I've tried to do: you keep
assuming you have some unique and special perspective and shroud all your statements in mysticism, when in fact you have the same position most people aim at, though we all tend to fall short. Your seemingly arrogant statements seem to me an evidence that you have your bias too: in that you assume we don't share your vision.
Edit 2: the above is all assuming I am right in my understanding of your position: removal of all bias and standing on rationality, observation, and corroboration alone. I still believe removal of all bias is impossible for all mankind, limited as we are.