Pastelland Forum

You can go and edit your page anytime you want.

Should we make a formal template to use for each user page?

That does sound like a good idea.

Firstly, I would like to suggest we refrain from the use of [redacted]. It does offer a convenient way to not go into detail, but it's annoyingly unoriginal. Not to mention it pulls the wiki farther into the realm of fiction, when we're trying to make it a source of information on the actual history on the forum as well as a piece of in-universe documentation.

Secondly, I really like the "pastel form/human form" approach Enichambus took to reconciling fact with fiction. I suggest we standardize that as how we treat our real and in-universe aspects. Using separate sections for the two, as Error has done with his article, is also something we do.

Error_3113 wrote:Should we make a formal template to use for each user page?

I agree too!

Ok, I can go back and take some of the SCP Redacteds and the like out. I think it was Sublevel who originally said he wanted to put those in to make it more SCP-like, but if it obscures too much detail then I agree, we should leave them out

Wow...

EDIT: it's true, there is a message in my FB, but it's under "others", and it's from 2013. I never got notified of it o_o

EDIT2: wait, so Lord of Flies = Borys?

When did this all happen? The article makes it seem like a Gemini-scale fallout, and I don't remember hearing anything about it.

Permission to adjust any user pages to fit the template that I came up with (except for infobox, I believe that was AC's work)?

What template would that be?