Sublevel 102 wrote:Please, help me.
I am translating Forum posts and I has some problems with translation.
1)
Lemartes wrote:
As for Sub 0 (Ancient Sub) Who is to say this was not the 1st Submachine built. After all even if time travel was involved according to anyone other than the builders it would have been the 1st. Its construction predates the the rest so far as we know on a liner time line. Wouldn't
that make it the 1st one build by a historical point of view
I am to say this. . it was made long after the first submachine. From the builders point of view, naturally, what other point of view can w take?...
historical? with the time machine a 'historical' point of view doesnt exist anymore.... Besides, they're ancient RUINS. we've got ruins up to date, so who tossed the idea that ancient location was built in BC? they could've built it in 1932 using some old ruins, as I see it. I'm not saying that they did, but there is a possibility...
I don't understand
Lemartes thinked that the Ancient Ruins was the first Submachine, builded by ancients. But Mateusz said that it was builded in 1932 using a time machine to got different parts of different ruins to make this Location.
Strangely, Mateusz mentioned that there is a posibility that "they" builded it.
Sublevel 102 wrote:Please, help me.
I am translating Forum posts and I has some problems with translation.
1)
Lemartes wrote:
As for Sub 0 (Ancient Sub) Who is to say this was not the 1st Submachine built. After all even if time travel was involved according to anyone other than the builders it would have been the 1st. Its construction predates the the rest so far as we know on a liner time line. Wouldn't
that make it the 1st one build by a historical point of view
I am to say this. . it was made long after the first submachine. From the builders point of view, naturally, what other point of view can w take?...
historical? with the time machine a 'historical' point of view doesnt exist anymore.... Besides, they're ancient RUINS. we've got ruins up to date, so who tossed the idea that ancient location was built in BC? they could've built it in 1932 using some old ruins, as I see it. I'm not saying that they did, but there is a possibility...
I don't understand this:
After all even if time travel was involved according to anyone other than the builders it would have been the 1st.
sentence.
And what does mean 'Builders point of view'?
2)
Lemartes wrote:
I think the reason you see no people is cause your the straggler in this game you have been left behind to catch up with everyone else.
What does this sentence mean?
1) example:
someone builds a bridge, uses a time machine to go to 2000 BC, and builds a pyramid.
historical point of view: the pyramid is the first ever built, since it was constructed in an older epoch.
builder's point of view: the bridge is the first ever built, because he built it the first.
2) it means the player sees no other people because he came the last, and missed all the action.
2) it means the player sees no other people because he came the last, and missed all the action.
thank you
1) example:
someone builds a bridge, uses a time machine to go to 2000 BC, and builds a pyramid.
historical point of view: the pyramid is the first ever built, since it was constructed in an older epoch.
builder's point of view: the bridge is the first ever built, because he built it the first.
no no. I understood what you are saying.
I don't understand construction of sentence. I don't...
wait...
LOL, during writing this post I understood everything that I didn't understand before!
The unique quote I don't understand is the one that says that Mur went 32 years back in time, he was in 1906 when he did, which means that he ended in 1874, but how he explored the subnet if this one was created in early XX century.
Last edited by ENIHCAMBUS on 16 Aug 2013 16:50, edited 1 time in total.
So, some progress with SNEE page redesign was done on ru.subwiki. Also I collected all of theories from snee and about to start to translate them (Shorter of them...).
Since en.subwiki missing many of theories, and some of them that on the wiki has different text, should I post all of them on separate page (Submachine_Network_Exploration_Experience/Theories?). And also add links from infoboxes on the SNEE location pages to actual theory, after that?
. it was made long after the first submachine. From the builders point of view, naturally, what other point of view can w take?...
