RANDOMNESS

[Anonymous1]

[Hacking complete]

I SAY YOU LIVE IN...

Somewhere near Versailles, France!

I know where you live, and I know there is a member here who lives there too...

[Vortex]

Though he's not active anymore

[ENIHCAMBUS]

Though he's not active anymore

Lucas Gelati, right?

[Vortex]

Yep.

[Sublevel 114]

this weird bug scares me...

what next?
explosion?

[- ak -]

Man, the very first Dead Space still creep me the f*** out. Sequels aren't as scary, though.

As for your smilies bug, I still don't see it on my account or browser and since Vortex claimed it didn't happens to his either, it is must be something on your computer/browser that reads your avatar as the happy face smilies. Try to clear your data & caches & cookies and try opening your browser. If that didn't works, try a different browser.

If this persists, I am not sure what else you should do >_>

[ENIHCAMBUS]

Perphaps the bug only exist in Opera (Is the browser that Sublevel uses).

[WorldisQuiet5256]

Opera (Is the browser that Sublevel uses).

[Vurn]

We construct a new static solution to the 5D Einstein-Maxwell equations describing a static black hole surrounded by a non-rotating dipole black ring. The configuration is kept in equilibrium by an external magnetic field interacting with the dipole charge of the black ring. The properties of the black Saturn-like configuration are studied and the basic physical quantities are calculated. The solution demonstrates 2-fold continuous non-uniqueness of the 5D magnetized static neutral black objects for fixed total mass and Melvin background.

Before my zookeeping foray, I spent a week trying to put AM outside QMA relative to an oracle, only to learn that this followed trivially from two known results: that of Vereshchagin [Ver92] that AM is outside PP relative to an oracle, and that of Kitaev and Watrous (unpublished, but mentioned in [Wat00]) that QMA is in PP. What to do next? One option would be to work on putting SZK outside QMA relative to an oracle. But instead I decided that, before hoisting one more brick onto the vast edifice of complexity, I'd do well to take stock of what was already known. Some theorists seem able to hold in their minds, in one instant, the results of every FOCS, STOC, and Complexity paper ever published. Not every proof, of course - but those can be looked up if one knows the results and to whom they're due.

[The Kakama]

Noob is a boon.