Pastelland Forum

Ok, I'll check it later.

Also, why noone answers my doubt? :'(

OnyxIonVortex wrote:so... what do you think about this?

OnyxIonVortex wrote:now that I saw the complete map of the pyramid, I'm having doubts as to whether I should make a separate page for the Temple Ruins. They're clearly integral part of the pyramid, and have the same architecture, while the Temple itself is more like "embedded" inside and has a differentiated style. So my doubt is whether I should make the page or keep it as a part of the Pyramid article. What do you think?

We have a big problem here cause I see it the opposite as people see it, now that I see the map.
I see the Pyramid as the whole structure, and inside the pyramid, at the base, there's the Temple, with the tombs and everything. (The game could have been perfectly called "Submachine 9: The Pyramid"). So, for me the correct thing to do is:

- Making a page for the Pyramid, and in the description, saying it contains the Temple (plus the other sections)
- Making a page for the Temple and in the description, saying it's part of the Pyramid.

OR:

- Stating the Temple is EVERYTHING we see in the game (exterior and interior) and stating the Temple has a part which is a Pyramid and inside it contains a location X that has the tombs. But that location X should be renamed to another thing instead of Temple.

I support this second option because remember we have only seen at least 1/3 of the Temple. Remember the glowing Karma map where only one of the three "squares" or "areas" is opened, but the other two remain closed.

RuloCore wrote:

OnyxIonVortex wrote:so... what do you think about this?

OnyxIonVortex wrote:now that I saw the complete map of the pyramid, I'm having doubts as to whether I should make a separate page for the Temple Ruins. They're clearly integral part of the pyramid, and have the same architecture, while the Temple itself is more like "embedded" inside and has a differentiated style. So my doubt is whether I should make the page or keep it as a part of the Pyramid article. What do you think?

We have a big problem here cause I see it the opposite as people see it, now that I see the map.
I see the Pyramid as the whole structure, and inside the pyramid, at the base, there's the Temple, with the tombs and everything. (The game could have been perfectly called "Submachine 9: The Pyramid"). So, for me the correct thing to do is:

- Making a page for the Pyramid, and in the description, saying it contains the Temple (plus the other sections)
- Making a page for the Temple and in the description, saying it's part of the Pyramid.

OR:

- Stating the Temple is EVERYTHING we see in the game (exterior and interior) and stating the Temple has a part which is a Pyramid and inside it contains a location X that has the tombs. But that location X should be renamed to another thing instead of Temple.

I support this second option because remember we have only seen at least 1/3 of the Temple. Remember the glowing Karma map where only one of the three "squares" or "areas" is opened, but the other two remain closed.

If by "glowing Karma map" you mean the second bowl of Karmic Water where you inserted the Karmic Cog Wheel, then that's not a map.
That's you activating the mechanism to move one of the cubes of stone out of the way, opening the way into the Pyramid portion of the Temple.
I.e. This:


Or do you mean something else entirely?

I mean that, but I saw the glowing scheme as if the other two "cubes" next to the opened one represented other unopened parts of the Temple. My fault. I now see the two cubes next to the opened cubes are LITERALLY the two cubes next to it


:facepalm:


YOU MAY SAY IM A DREAMER

RuloCore wrote:

OnyxIonVortex wrote:so... what do you think about this?

OnyxIonVortex wrote:now that I saw the complete map of the pyramid, I'm having doubts as to whether I should make a separate page for the Temple Ruins. They're clearly integral part of the pyramid, and have the same architecture, while the Temple itself is more like "embedded" inside and has a differentiated style. So my doubt is whether I should make the page or keep it as a part of the Pyramid article. What do you think?

We have a big problem here cause I see it the opposite as people see it, now that I see the map.
I see the Pyramid as the whole structure, and inside the pyramid, at the base, there's the Temple, with the tombs and everything. (The game could have been perfectly called "Submachine 9: The Pyramid"). So, for me the correct thing to do is:

- Making a page for the Pyramid, and in the description, saying it contains the Temple (plus the other sections)
- Making a page for the Temple and in the description, saying it's part of the Pyramid.

OR:

- Stating the Temple is EVERYTHING we see in the game (exterior and interior) and stating the Temple has a part which is a Pyramid and inside it contains a location X that has the tombs. But that location X should be renamed to another thing instead of Temple.

I support this second option because remember we have only seen at least 1/3 of the Temple. Remember the glowing Karma map where only one of the three "squares" or "areas" is opened, but the other two remain closed.

i'd support the first option, because apart from what ShadowNiL said above, the Temple has different style, and its rooftop (yellow dragons) breaks the floor of the pyramid, almost like it didn't belong there and was teleported inside by force.

And... now there is a Garden article. -_-

what should we do? continue the discussion in the wiki...?

Hey, I made sub9 map (Current one doesn't look good enough, it saved in jpg, most of pictures taken before things happen things looks out of place because of that, etc).

So can anyone draw fancy arrows, like on sub7 one?

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/342 ... 20done.psd

Thanks! I've edited it, it didn't need many arrows, only those for the secret section. The problem is that it says the file size is too big and doesn't let me upload it.

EDIT: here is the image http://i62.tinypic.com/2qjlwy8.jpg

And you saved it in jpg... I think you miss a point a bit

No... it changed to jpg when I uploaded it, I swear o_o