Page 9 of 17
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 13 Dec 2014 23:50
by ENIHCAMBUS
Oh, I see...
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 14 Dec 2014 22:16
by ENIHCAMBUS
Anyone found forming attachments to an SCP will be removed to a less people-intensive duty.
What does it mean? Being reclassfied to D-class personel taking duty in keter class SCP experiments? Or being sent to Auswitch trough a time traveling SCP?
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 14 Dec 2014 22:43
by Sublevel 114
what?
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 14 Dec 2014 23:30
by ENIHCAMBUS
Well, at least the foundation got reasons.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 15 Dec 2014 03:00
by Diamonds
i'm making a d20 modern campaign set in the Foundation. pretty sweet in my opinion.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 16 Dec 2014 18:22
by Jatsko
SCP 201. Alternate reality is a little Submachine-like, in my opinion. Imagine living there for three months. What would you do?
Edit: Also, description of SCP 213 made me laugh out loud. So weird.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 16 Dec 2014 19:44
by ENIHCAMBUS
You must check SCP-732, I'm not sure why its standard SCP and not joke SCP.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 16 Dec 2014 23:06
by Ancient Crystal
Yeah, the elaboration squirrel is more serious than that.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 21 Dec 2014 06:54
by ENIHCAMBUS
Another regular SCP that doesn't makes any sence as a regular SCP is SCP-586.
Re: Secure. Contain. Protect.
Posted: 21 Dec 2014 07:00
by Jatsko
I looked it up, I think it's funny
It has it's own class!