Pastelland Forum

<Since I rethought my old vision of submachine, this theory is not relevant now.>

Mateusz had stated that the Submachine references in Covert Front were simply easter eggs, nothing more.
Also, you may want to read through your theory as their a few obvious mistakes like the misspelling: "Submashine."

Overall good theory, but you may want to find some evidence to support because at the moment it's mostly speculation

The Abacus wrote:Mateusz had stated that the Submachine references in Covert Front were simply easter eggs, nothing more.
Also, you may want to read through your theory as their a few obvious mistakes like the misspelling: "Submashine."

Overall good theory, but you may want to find some evidence to support because at the moment it's mostly speculation

Okay. I don't know. Really. Stop - Karl Von Toten designed Loop Device... I think it's not just an easter egg...
Thanks!

In the near future I will try to correct all errors.

P.S - Updated. Thanks for comment!

Comments please...
I need to know what you think, what to fix, what to add...

I will read tomorrow. So tired now...

Reailty is all in Lost...

RomaH wrote:("rudiment" of the future locations can be seen in the coordinates 671 (SNEE))

Its 672. :p

BTW: RomaH said 671, and Into the Void 673. Its that hard to remember a location with "strong" info about Submachine.

Update!

ENIHCAMBUS wrote: Its 672. :p

BTW: RomaH said 671, and Into the Void 673. Its that hard to remember a location with "strong" info about Submachine.

Oh, thanks!

WorldisQuiet5256 wrote:Reailty is all in Lost...

Really...

Also wanted to ask if you like this style of theory (Plot - Subnet Devices - Plot)?

Also wanted to ask if you like this style of theory (Plot - Subnet Devices - Plot)?

I'd just like to point out something:

Often, when people post their first theory it often ends up being an interpretation and a representation of what they think is actually going on in the realm of the Submachine (tying all the sporadic plot points together etc.). You have done something similar here. The only problem with this is that it's not exactly a theory, it's closer to a fan fiction. There is absolutely NO problem with this as long as you don't get the two confused. For something to be a theory it needs to be supported by evidence – you can take actual theories as examples. I don't wish to be a critic or anything... but it's first mistake a lot of people make (I made that mistake too)

RomaH wrote:

WorldisQuiet5256 wrote:Reailty is all in Lost...

Really...

Also wanted to ask if you like this style of theory

Sorry, my mind sometimes speaks phrases that take time to figure out.
The do have something to do with your theory.
It just takes time for the answer to reveal itself.