RANDOMNESS

User avatar
Vurn
subnet traveller
Posts: 1026
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 19:11
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Vurn »

borys610 wrote:dualizm korpuskularno-falowy
częściowe zaburzenie ciągłości tkanki kostnej
TT: I guess one could use those words to describe it.
TT: If armed with a predilection for the inapt.
User avatar
WorldisQuiet5256
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5667
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:56
Location: 966 - Quiet Rooms - WiQ

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by WorldisQuiet5256 »

Helllllllooooo
La
La
Laaaaa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjmgzLVuWLU
WHERE DO WE COME FROM
WHAT ARE WE
WHERE ARE WE
GOING
User avatar
Vurn
subnet traveller
Posts: 1026
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 19:11
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Vurn »

Mathematics of ancestral genealogy

You have two parents, four grandparents, eight greatgrandparents and sixteen greatgreatgrandparents.
For the n-th level of ancestral kinship, you have 2^n ancestors of that level. The zeroth level is yourself, as 2^0=1.
Your parents are the first level, so you have two of them, as 2^1=2. N can only be a natural number, zero included.
nImageImage
Ancestral kinship is henceforth defined as the set of all people who have directly worked in the past to ensure your (and your other ancestors') existence, in the biological meaning of the word [assuming no incest]. It is later abbreviated as a-kinship.
For n-th level of a-kinship, 2^n-1 ancestors are male, and the same number is female.
[For n>0 and nImageImage, as 2^0-1=0.5, and the number of people can only be an integer]
Therefore, f(n)=2^n where n is a natural number is a function visualizing the amount of a-kinship members.
For given number x of ancestors, their level is the number of x's non-distinct prime factors, or the logarithm of x to the base two.
The number of all the ancestors is the infinite sum of consecutive, natural powers of two: (2^0)+(2^1)+(2^2)+(2^3)+...

Construction of n-th level family names and their abbreviations

Zeroth, first and second levels of a-kinship have distinct names: you, parents, grandparents. Names for members of subsequent values of n are created by using the prefix great-, which is stackable - for n=5, for example, the name is greatgreatgrandparents.
Therefore, for n-th level of a-kinship, the name has n-3 great- prefixes; if that value is non-positive, a distinct name should be utilized.
Hence, k(n)=n-3 for n>3 is a function determining the number of naming prefixes.
With greater values of n, names like greatgreatgreatgreatgrandparents becaume tiresome to spell out, so they are shortened to great-m-parents, where m is the number of great- prefixes except for one, which is said at the beginning. For example, the members of the 10th level of a-kinship are great-6-parents [read as: great six parents], as m=(k(n))-1=n-4.
Hence, a great-1-parent is a greatgreatgrandparent, great-0-parent is a greatgrandparent, great-(-1)-parent is a grandparent, great-(-2)-parent is a regular parent, and great-(-3)-parent is yourself. These names can be subsituted for the regular ones.

Discrete names of given family members

Formulae given in the previous chapter do not, however, make discerning given, distinct family members possible. It is also inefficient and troubling to say, e.g., 'the mother of the mother of the father of the father of my mother'. Therefore, we propose a clear and efficient notation, called a v-name. A mother is depicted by an m, and a father by an f. The name of a given member is constructed by listing the genders of all the ancestors preceeding that person [in downward direction on a genealogy tree]. The aforementioned 'mother of the mother of the father of the father of my mother' is hence abbreviated as 'mffmm'. Reading this kind of abbreviations from left to right is like tracing the genealogy tree from down up - mother, father, father, mother, mother - so, the mother of the mother of the father of the father of the mother, as the English language approaches it from the opposite direction.
An abbreviated genealogy tree from n=4 to n=0 is given below.
Abbreviations in |brackets| mean marriages. The || line is the border between the mother's and the father's side. The |-| sign means a marriage between the mother's and the father's side, only present in n=1. Y stands for you.

| mmmm mmmf | mmfm mmff | mfmm mfmf | mffm mfff || fmmm fmmf | fmfm fmff | ffmm ffmf | fffm ffff |
| mmm mmf | mfm mff || fmm fmf | ffm fff|
| mm mf || fm ff |
| m |-| f |
y

Members whose v-names [abbreviated names] consist of only m's of f's are called border members. For a given n (bigger than 0) there are two border members, so they always make up 1/(2^n-1) of the family level members, and 2k/(2^n)+(2^n+1)+...+(2^k) of a given interval of a-member levels, where n is the smallest, and k the biggest value of the level number.
If in the v-name of an a-member more than one character comes up subsequently, it can be also shortened, such as mmmfmffm --> 3m-fm-2f-m.

Where the fuck is my Ph.D. right now.

(Next: time travel incest up in this bitch.)
TT: I guess one could use those words to describe it.
TT: If armed with a predilection for the inapt.
User avatar
Sublevel 114
layer restorer
Posts: 16589
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Sublevel 114 »

^wha da fuk?
User avatar
gil2455526
subnet notes finder
Posts: 833
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:35

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by gil2455526 »

Did I ever told you Scientific thesis make me dizzy *_*
Just smile and wave boys. Smile and wave...
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Vortex »

Vurn wrote:The number of all the ancestors is the infinite sum of consecutive, natural powers of two: (2^0)+(2^1)+(2^2)+(2^3)+...
Infinite? :P

Anyways I see a problem with this simplification, many of the ancestors you count as different are really the same; two ancestors of the 17th or 18th generation that are enough far apart in the tree are already very likely to be siblings. If your reasoning were true, around the 33th generation (log_2 of 7 billion) your ancestors alone would be more than all the people on Earth right now, and that's impossible, so in the long term it fails (in the short term it's a good approximation, though :) )
User avatar
ENIHCAMBUS
karma portal traveller
Posts: 8653
Joined: 04 Feb 2013 22:17
Location: Pastel Lands.

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by ENIHCAMBUS »

OnyxIonVortex wrote:
Vurn wrote:The number of all the ancestors is the infinite sum of consecutive, natural powers of two: (2^0)+(2^1)+(2^2)+(2^3)+...
Infinite? :P

Anyways I see a problem with this simplification, many of the ancestors you count as different are really the same; two ancestors of the 17th or 18th generation that are enough far apart in the tree are already very likely to be siblings. If your reasoning were true, around the 33th generation (log_2 of 7 billion) your ancestors alone would be more than all the people on Earth right now, and that's impossible, so in the long term it fails (in the short term it's a good approximation, though :) )
Because they are a lot of diferent factors that make it skeewed.
ENIHCAMBUS: State of the Art Scanning!
🧐
User avatar
Sublevel 114
layer restorer
Posts: 16589
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Sublevel 114 »

Submachine series FAKE ending
Image
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Vortex »

Lol, I hope not :P
User avatar
Sublevel 114
layer restorer
Posts: 16589
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23

Re: RANDOMNESS

Post by Sublevel 114 »

Lol, I hope not
You noticed hidden "fake" word? If so, then your quote turns into 'Lol, I hope'. :P
Post Reply