Meditations

Boingo
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2729
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 19:55
Location: ...

Re: Meditations

Post by Boingo »

So you are suggesting we abandon half the so-called 'useless crap and procrastination" threads?
Would it not be easier to (in hope that this forum doesn't end up as clogged as the old one) pass new thread submissions via the rest of the community?
Redafro
subnet technician
Posts: 360
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 12:52
Location: Missouri USA
Contact:

Re: Meditations

Post by Redafro »

Well, I'm not necessarily suggesting that, yet I certainly have abandoned such threads myself. I think you do what you want, but if you would like to keep an interesting discussion thread going, or set of them, I think the guidelines we've discussed so far are a good step towards that.
The Abacus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2877
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41

Re: Meditations

Post by The Abacus »

(Sorry to jump in, but) I agree with what Babylon and Redafro has said – that we can create a new thread if it's necessary. That should prevent this thread clogging up with a constant subject while also restraining the creation of threads that would have a conversation that dies out quickly.
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
User avatar
The Kakama
karma portal traveller
Posts: 6243
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 16:35
Location: Selangor, Malaysia

Re: Meditations

Post by The Kakama »

The Abacus wrote:(Sorry to jump in, but) I agree with what Babylon and Redafro has said – that we can create a new thread if it's necessary. That should prevent this thread clogging up with a constant subject while also restraining the creation of threads that would have a conversation that dies out quickly.
So, a second Meditations thread but focusing on one particular subject?
I'm not sure if that's necessary though.
Is this my final form?
The Abacus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2877
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41

Re: Meditations

Post by The Abacus »

Exactly, if it is necessary, we create the thread; if it isn't, we don't.
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
User avatar
Isobel The Sorceress
subnet technician
Posts: 423
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:42
Location: Finland

Re: Meditations

Post by Isobel The Sorceress »

Now we only need to agree on what counts as "necessary".
User avatar
The Kakama
karma portal traveller
Posts: 6243
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 16:35
Location: Selangor, Malaysia

Re: Meditations

Post by The Kakama »

Probably if a discussion lasts more than a certain number of pages.(Eg. 5-7 pages)
Is this my final form?
The Abacus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2877
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41

Re: Meditations

Post by The Abacus »

More likely if a subject (e.g. politics) seems to reoccur commonly. A discussion can easily last 5-7 pages (just look at this discussion – it's already close to that) but can they quickly end and not be brought up again.
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
User avatar
The Kakama
karma portal traveller
Posts: 6243
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 16:35
Location: Selangor, Malaysia

Re: Meditations

Post by The Kakama »

Good point. So now we just see if a topic like that comes up, we make a thread.
Seems like a good idea, such threads exist in the theories and suggestions forum.
Now see what everyone else thinks.
Is this my final form?
User avatar
Anteroinen
subnet traveller
Posts: 1341
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
Location: Finland

Re: Meditations

Post by Anteroinen »

So now that we've established some guidelines, rules and principles, maybe we should make the next step – actually discuss something that is not discussing about discussing. So, does anyone have an interesting topic to bring up?

What comes to mind now is for instance the position of languages in the modern world. Will English become the only language over time, or what will happen? Is this good or bad? Obviously there are economic benefits here, but otherwise I view linguicide in negative light.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
Post Reply