subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Do we need more theories in the subnet?

yes
19
79%
no
5
21%
 
Total votes: 24
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by Vortex »

not anymore :B
User avatar
WorldisQuiet5256
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5667
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:56
Location: 966 - Quiet Rooms - WiQ

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by WorldisQuiet5256 »

Well we should have something more than just Theories on SNEE. 2/3 of SNEE is noting but Theories. Maybe add something like the Lost Note on that Cliff, it gave more to the Submachine Game Story/Plot.

We could add Notes that we written that could be added to SNEE, to give more to the Submachine Story Structure. We could put it on certain subjects such as how Henry O'Toole built the physical structure of the Subnet.
WHERE DO WE COME FROM
WHAT ARE WE
WHERE ARE WE
GOING
borys610

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by borys610 »

Like "He fell" note?
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by Vortex »

I'd also find it nice to have more canon elements in SNEE, I'm sure Mateusz will add more of these in the future.

Then there are also the photographies, they could take the place of theories as the main user-generated content being added in SNEE in later stages of the project.

And maybe even videos, like the black hole one. There are so many possibilities :D
User avatar
The Kakama
karma portal traveller
Posts: 6243
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 16:35
Location: Selangor, Malaysia

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by The Kakama »

...or sketchings,like 010.
Is this my final form?
The Abacus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2877
Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by The Abacus »

These are all very interesting thoughts...
Oh, and how about more puzzles and the access of other transportation methods (e.g. root transporter, green karma portals, movers etc.), then it will really become a Massively (with emphasis on the Massive) Single-Player Online game.
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
User avatar
MateuszSkutnik
The Architect
Posts: 806
Joined: 20 Nov 2012 18:03

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by MateuszSkutnik »

that's the idea behind this project.
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by Vortex »

These are all very interesting thoughts...
Oh, and how about more puzzles and the access of other transportation methods (e.g. root transporter, green karma portals, movers etc.), then it will really become a Massively (with emphasis on the Massive) Single-Player Online game.
that's the idea behind this project.
:D

anyways, back to the main topic...
it looks like Redafro's theory is one of the most suitable to be in SNEE :) will you accept it, Mateusz?
User avatar
MateuszSkutnik
The Architect
Posts: 806
Joined: 20 Nov 2012 18:03

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by MateuszSkutnik »

link?
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12141
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: subnet theories - all done. Do we need more?

Post by Vortex »

http://submachine.wikia.com/wiki/Redafro's_Theories

It's the sixth theory specifically (Submachine as Physics-Engine Field) what we were referring to, but all his theories are excellent. I dunno why but it doesn't let me link to the theory directly.
Post Reply